Diaspore

Explore / brief

Built on 2026-11-10 by the real pipeline and not rebuilt since. No person has verified it. It is a reading aid, not a memo, not a prediction and not advice.

Science brief: a reading aid, unvalidated by any person. Not a prediction and not advice. Public data only.

Science brief: targeted protein degradation

As of 2024-12-31. Topic mode. Literature: targeted protein degradation. 45 abstracts read, 24 claims checked, 0 papers had no abstract and were not read.

Read this first.

Measured, once, on planted errors (an upper bound on real ones):

Extraction: Measured accuracy on a fresh sample (agent readers, both must agree): output_type right 97% (92%–99%); model_system right 95% (90%–98%); scale right 97% (93%–99%); claim supported 98% (94%–99%); effect numbers supported 99% (92%–100%); limitations supported 93% (85%–97%).

Where a paper disagrees with a claim

None found in this pack.

Labs by strength of evidence

#LabTop tier among verified claimsVerified claimsIndependent supportsContradictionsLens orderCompany, PI named on the filing
1Daohong Zhou, University of Floridaanimal2 of 2003none found
2Olorunseun Olatunji Ogunwobi, Cornell Universityanimal2 of 2004none found
3Pengda Liu, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillanimal2 of 2005none found
4Sarah M. Wignall, Northwestern Universityanimal1 of 10014none found
5Allen C. Gao, University of California, Davisanimal1 of 10016none found
6Roberto Chiarle, Harvard Universityanimal1 of 10018none found
7Nathanael S. Gray, Stanford Universityin vitro2 of 2001Soltego, Inc. (2018-12-18)
8Lindsey Ingerman James, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillin vitro1 of 2002none found
9Weiping Tang, University of Wisconsin–Madisonin vitro1 of 1006none found
10Thomas J. Kodadek, University of Floridain vitro1 of 1007none found
11William G. Kaelin, Harvard Universityin vitro1 of 10011none found
12Zhijian Qian, University of Floridain vitro1 of 10012none found
13Alice Y. Ting, Stanford Universityin vitro1 of 10015none found
14Michael J. Palladino, University of Pittsburghin vitro1 of 10017none found
15Xiaolin Cheng, The Ohio State Universityin vitro1 of 10019none found
16Andrew Tsourkas, University of Pennsylvanianot stated1 of 1008none found
17Eric S. Fischer, Harvard Universitynot stated1 of 1009none found
18Ophir Shalem, University of Pennsylvanianot stated1 of 10010none found
19Stuart H. Orkin, Harvard Universitynot stated1 of 10013none found

Claims and their evidence

Daohong Zhou, University of Florida

Olorunseun Olatunji Ogunwobi, Cornell University

Pengda Liu, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Sarah M. Wignall, Northwestern University

Allen C. Gao, University of California, Davis

Roberto Chiarle, Harvard University

Nathanael S. Gray, Stanford University

Lindsey Ingerman James, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Weiping Tang, University of Wisconsin–Madison

Thomas J. Kodadek, University of Florida

William G. Kaelin, Harvard University

Zhijian Qian, University of Florida

Alice Y. Ting, Stanford University

Michael J. Palladino, University of Pittsburgh

Xiaolin Cheng, The Ohio State University

Andrew Tsourkas, University of Pennsylvania

Eric S. Fischer, Harvard University

Ophir Shalem, University of Pennsylvania

Stuart H. Orkin, Harvard University

Framed read (unvalidated: one model's synthesis of the records above)

Claim that carries the most weight: C07. C07 is the one claim here that describes degradation without ubiquitin, so any reading of this pack as a single proteasome-driven degradation story depends on it being right as stated. Its only record, R4097, is from the claim's own paper and its quote says degradation of "some of these target proteins", so the scope of the claim is narrower than the claim line.

What would have to hold:

Questions a data room would have to answer:

Cannot say:

What was not shown

Run record